ANIMAL FORUM

> ANIMAL RIGHTS BILL 1 - Tom Regan speaks.

> lesley the lying HIV-spreading slut of Cork blabbered:
> > ANIMAL RIGHTS BILL 1 - Tom Regan speaks.
>
> ...speaks bullshit, as usual. Regan is a washed-up
> has-been.

> Rudy Canoza wrote .
>> lesley the lying HIV-spreading slut of Cork blabbered:
>>> ANIMAL RIGHTS BILL 1 - Tom Regan speaks.
>> ...speaks bullshit, as usual. Regan is a washed-up
>> has-been.
>
> Bullies project

> pearl wrote:

> >>> ANIMAL RIGHTS BILL 1 - Tom Regan speaks.
> >> ...speaks bullshit, as usual. Regan is a washed-up
> >> has-been.
> >
> > Bullies project
>
> Regans voice has the melodious tones of a cross between a preacher and
> a Johnny Cochrane type lawyer. In the followup video he is condescending
> as hell to the other speakers. How dare they express childish opinions
> that he has previously made mincemeat of in his books? Cant they read?
> How dare they not revere the great Animal Rights authors? His speech is
> long on emotive appeal and short on reason, no mention at all of course
> of the collateral deaths issue.
>
> Basically he is pompous, rude and a bully.

> Dutch wrote
>> pearl wrote:
>
>>>>> ANIMAL RIGHTS BILL 1 - Tom Regan speaks.
>>>> ...speaks bullshit, as usual. Regan is a washed-up
>>>> has-been.
>>> Bullies project
>> Regans voice has the melodious tones of a cross between a preacher and
>> a Johnny Cochrane type lawyer. In the followup video he is condescending
>> as hell to the other speakers. How dare they express childish opinions
>> that he has previously made mincemeat of in his books? Cant they read?
>> How dare they not revere the great Animal Rights authors? His speech is
>> long on emotive appeal and short on reason, no mention at all of course
>> of the collateral deaths issue.
>>
>> Basically he is pompous, rude and a bully.
>
> You have no credibility, mr. balloon clown, and youre still projecting.

> pearl wrote:
> > Dutch wrote
> >> pearl wrote:
> >
> >>>>> ANIMAL RIGHTS BILL 1 - Tom Regan speaks.
> >>>> ...speaks bullshit, as usual. Regan is a washed-up
> >>>> has-been.
> >>> Bullies project
> >> Regans voice has the melodious tones of a cross between a preacher and
> >> a Johnny Cochrane type lawyer. In the followup video he is condescending
> >> as hell to the other speakers. How dare they express childish opinions
> >> that he has previously made mincemeat of in his books? Cant they read?
> >> How dare they not revere the great Animal Rights authors? His speech is
> >> long on emotive appeal and short on reason, no mention at all of course
> >> of the collateral deaths issue.
> >>
> >> Basically he is pompous, rude and a bully.
> >
> > You have no credibility, mr. balloon clown, and youre still projecting.
>
> Ill remind you that youre the LAST person on earth that should be
> bringing up the subject of credibility ms tinfoil hat.

> Back to the topic..
>
> Even in the hatchet-job of the video follow-up where all the against
> speakers are shown only a minute or so in total, a lot of valid points
> are raised which he never addresses in his conclusion, preferring to be
> insulting and condescending.

> Dutch wrote in message
news:ZJ3ti.29752$fJ5.24783@pd7urf1no...
>> pearl wrote:
>>> Dutch wrote
>>>> pearl wrote:
>>>>>>> ANIMAL RIGHTS BILL 1 - Tom Regan speaks.
>>>>>> ...speaks bullshit, as usual. Regan is a washed-up
>>>>>> has-been.
>>>>> Bullies project
>>>> Regans voice has the melodious tones of a cross between a preacher and
>>>> a Johnny Cochrane type lawyer. In the followup video he is condescending
>>>> as hell to the other speakers. How dare they express childish opinions
>>>> that he has previously made mincemeat of in his books? Cant they read?
>>>> How dare they not revere the great Animal Rights authors? His speech is
>>>> long on emotive appeal and short on reason, no mention at all of course
>>>> of the collateral deaths issue.
>>>>
>>>> Basically he is pompous, rude and a bully.
>>> You have no credibility, mr. balloon clown, and youre still projecting.
>> Ill remind you that youre the LAST person on earth that should be
>> bringing up the subject of credibility ms tinfoil hat.
>
> And Ill remind you that every time you try that one on, you end up
> crawling away with pie on your face. You are a proven liar, dutch.

>> Back to the topic..
>>
>> Even in the hatchet-job of the video follow-up where all the against
>> speakers are shown only a minute or so in total, a lot of valid points
>> are raised which he never addresses in his conclusion, preferring to be
>> insulting and condescending.
>
> What valid points doesnt he address, you projecting hypocrite?