On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:37:41 +0000, amacmil304@aol.com wrote:
>On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:57:01 +0000, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article ,
>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:35:21 +0000, Malcolm
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>In article ,
>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:26:27 +0000, Malcolm
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In article ,
>>>>>>amacmil304@aol.com writes
>>>>>>>What evidence exists that ALL red squirrels do not have resistance to
>>>>>>>SQPV?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why are reds completely absent from so much of Britain where they were
>>>>>>formerly common? If there was significant resistance, wouldnt you
>>>>>>expect to find them living within their former range alongside greys?
>>>>>
>>>>>In typical sloppiness you dont answer the question.
>>>>>
>>>>You dont even recognise an answer, now. Your comprehension has just got
>>>>worse and worse.
>>>
>>>But its not an answer. Are you trying to say theyve all died from
>>>SQPV and that none are resistant to the disease?
>>>
>>You are suggesting by your question that some may be resistant.
>
>Yes.
>
>>If they
>>are, then wouldnt one expect to find them living within their former
>>range alongside greys?
>
>Not necessarily. Change in habitat by forestry policies and human
>intrusion could be the reason.
Red squirrels are not long lived anyway, and habitat decline has
forced them into isolated community, where inbreeding and disease gets
a real kick start.
There is NO problem in the USA between reds and greys and never has
been.
Its a cynical COn by the charities involved to feather their own
nests. The millions of pounds conned out of the public will not be
spent on red squirrel habitat thats for sure!
When you get the likes of Ogilvie sniffing round the trough you can be
sure something underhand is at foot.
I dont donate to any of them these days, I spend the money up the pub.
pam the SPAMMERS send an email to enquires@urfreesim.co.uk