ANIMAL FORUM

Balham Hill Post Office (14/Nov/2002)

Certainty level: 80%

By mid-November 2002 the persecution had again dwindled, as happens sometimes,
when along came this item.
I spent most of my time at home, going occasionally to the shops in Clapham
South, or into town to meet people. On this particular
Thursday I only left the house once, for less than fifteen minutes to post a
letter (special delivery, because my ordinary and
recorded delivery letters had been disappearing en route for some time - not
that anyone would accuse MI5 of such petty harassment).
At the post office counter there was an Asian guy talking into his mobile phone
and grinning away. There is a probability that
his comments were directed at me, as I will explain further. The second segment
of audio closely follows the first segment.

youll do it today? lets meet about 3 oclock and have some lunch. I got stuff
to do and Ill go to the bank,
get this sh.. fucking moving yeah. Even just a little bit do something. He
doesnt understand, you know what it is,
I dont want to tell him again cause then he might, he thinks were having a go
at him, Im not having a go at him,
Im explain to him

Explanation: The guy is talking about some bloke who is unnamed, however it
might be interpreted as being in code about me.
Ill go to the bank... variously interpretable, either literally, or as
sounds-like wank which has been a consistent
theme in MI5s abuse. get this shit fucking moving... abuse... could be
interpreted as MI5s criticism of my inertness.
The state spends hundreds of thousands of pounds a year - they want to see some
result, not just neutrality and ordinariness.
he doesnt understand... MI5 claim Im stupid... but the numbers and bits of
paper prove otherwise, so perhaps what that
is really about is their agents subconscious perception of themselves.

having a go at him... sounds like theyre having a go at me, doesnt it? You
might take the audio at face value and assume
its about some other guy, but its normal MI5 procedure to pretend to be talking
about someone else, and make the content of
the message very relevant to me, or their perception of me.

for some reason it doesnt get into his head, I dont know why... hes lost it
completely, hasnt he

What reason is there for it not getting into his (my) head? Stupidity is
implied. Also implied is that it does get into his head;
were intentionally causing him damage. Hes lost it completely... for some time
I have suffered from OCD... lost it completely
is the persecutors observation of my illness, which they see through the
surveillance on my home, which they caused.

24682


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access