ANIMAL FORUM

A place where people talk about animals
It is currently January 5, 2009, 7:08 pm

All times are UTC





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 2008-01-01 15:43:01
Online
Registered User

Joined: 2008-01-01 15:43:01
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= my response. to the harassment -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

My first reaction in 1990/91 was to assume that. if I broke contact then
they would not be able to follow. and would lose interest. So I did the
things that have been suggested by other people; I sold my. television,
stopped listening to the radio and tried to withdraw away from. the sources
of abuse as much as possible. I. reasoned that they must have more important
things to deal with and that. normal people would simply leave me alone if
it were. made difficult for them to continue their harassment.

I reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness of the. abusers. They did not
let up but instead got to people around me, mainly people at. work, to do
their. dirty work for them. I went to see my GP, who refused to believe what
he was being told,. and refused to direct me on to anyone who could be of
practical assistance. It was not until three years had passed that. the GP
admitted the matter was outside his. competence and suggested going to the
police.

In the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance. experts from a
private detective agency to. sweep our house and telephone for bugging
devices. They conducted a thorough search and found. nothing; but as noted
above, since the existence of surveillance was being. forced in my face by
the. harassers, you would expect them to have taken the possibility of a
counter-surveillance sweep into account when. planning the type of devices
to. be employed.

In Easter. 1995 I made a complaint to my local Police station in London, but
the police have. not expressed any intention to do anything about the
continuing harassment (were. not saying its happening and were not
saying it isnt happening were the words. used). I think the officer I
spoke to at Easter wasnt aware of it. happening, although other members of
the police force obviously do. know.

From. April 1995 until the present time the matter has been discussed in a
lot of detail on the Usenet (Internet) uk.misc newsgroup.. That discussion
has. given birth to the article which you are now reading. My hopes in
posting to Usenet. were that wider publicizing would discourage the security
services from continuing their harassment, and draw people out. into
concurring with the truth of what was. being said. Neither of those have
followed, but the discussion has served a purpose. in allowing this
structured. report to be created.

8100


Top
 Profile
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 posts ] 



 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
No new posts MI.5Pe rsecution , p urpose in publi cizing it; censor ship in uk. * newsgr oups

0

2008-01-01 15:15:25

No new posts M.I5.Pe rsecution - w hy won t t he B ritish po lice do their j ob an d p ut a s top to it ?

0

2008-01-01 14:14:29

No new posts MI`5 Pe rsecution , wh y w ont t he Britis h pol ice do th eir jo b an d put a stop to it ?

0

2008-01-01 13:48:05

No new posts M`I,5.Pe rsecution . MI 5 Ins ist th at these Faxe s m ust Contin ue

0

2007-12-31 11:47:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 43243@324234.com (Alan),NSI, 1 guests, imprezy integracyjne nieruchomości Ruda Śląska Pozycjonowanie kalkulator kredytowy ERP


New posts New posts    No new posts No new posts    Announce Announcement
New posts [ Popular ] New posts [ Popular ]    No new posts [ Popular ] No new posts [ Popular ]    Sticky Sticky
New posts [ Locked ] New posts [ Locked ]    No new posts [ Locked ] No new posts [ Locked ]    Moved topic Moved topic
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 luxury poznan phpBB Group