Basically it is hard to believe that any country would love to wipe out
Korean,
except some politician nuts ( quite a lot in Japan too, though they may not
speak
aloud their thoughts ). Yet, there are always some insane nuts who want to
play with fire,
though everyone is trying to avoid misunderstanding in the real desirable
goals of the
talks. When all diplomatical and political measures cannot solve the
problem and
particularly when some action of force is looking more or less the last
resort, then
the nasty things will unfold.
------------
Victor Britian wrote in message
news:bef374d2.0307130057.1b34186a@posting.google.com...
> They sure are, IMHO, begging to be nuked, endagering the whole planet
> like that. I have watched, in awe, the brilliant military strategies
> of the US of A over the years and I cant help thinking that this time
> it would be better to wipe out Korea with bio or chemical weapons and
> to save the nukes for France?
>
>
> Maximus wrote in message
news:...
> > The game may have twists and turns soon, though US, Korea and Japan
> > try to avoid the madness. But North Korea will increase the pressure.
> > Whatever options, at least some preparation must have been quietly on
> > its way. With this kind of madness, actions will have different forms,
more
> > determinate and ruthless, IMO.
> >
> >
> > -----------------
> >
> > Victor Britian wrote in message
> > news:bef374d2.0307120630.73c578e4@posting.google.com...
> > > Why not release bio-weapons on your enemy and kill them all! That way
> > > all their art treasures and natural deposits will be in tact for you.
> > > Hey, why not put a puppet government in there and look after their
> > > resources for them that are left in a fair and honest way? Just a
> > > thought.
> > >
> > >
> > > u2 fan wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > Prophetically this could be a shock or a non-starter or explode on
> > launch,
> > > > how come there seems no spiritual noise on this topic.
> > > >
> > > > Three options
> > > >
> > > > 1) N Korea does a surprise nuclear attack on USA ( very foolish
> > concidering
> > > > reprocusions = N Korea turned to ashes, but we are dealing with a
mad
> > man
> > > > running N Korea )
> > > > 2) Sells weapons to people who will attack ( more probable )
> > > > 3) Just allot of shouting like a dog with allot of bark but no bite,
> > very
> > > > illogical for N Korea to attack USA since USA keeps N korea alive
> > > > financially even though corruption means USA is indirectly paying a
> > corrupt
> > > > government to develope nukes aimed at USA ! ( oh what a world we
live in
> > ! )
> > > > , without USAs support N Korea would decay to nothing significant
> > > >
> > > > Other good options : A Military Coup getting rid of mad man running
N
> > Korea
> > > > and install democratic system to benefit whole N Korea, bring
stability,
> > > > eradicate corruption.
> > > >
> > > > Bad options : Sanctions could push insain leaders over edge OR cause
a
> > coup
> > > > but high risk stragergy, do nothing means N Korea export nukes to
> > Islamic
> > > > extremists who are willing to use them, or do nothing again leads to
> > coup
> > > > since people see very expensive weapons but no food and no results
hence
> > > > leader is hated and removed, or do nothing and Korea is just left to
> > suffer
> > > > ( probable course of action ) and internalise anger against its
self ie
> > > > slow painful self destruction