Laurie wrote:
> wrote in message
> news:vgifev86mqoo0g6004tv1cq4fnoon6t5jt@4ax.com...
>
>
>> Including the benefits of eating meat without overindulgence.
>
> What, exactly, are those benefits?
Nutrition: protein, vitamins, minerals.
Heres a link to a Canadian page that shows the
nutrition content of 100 grams of lean sirloin. Its
pretty substantial.
> Science please, not cowboy cult propaganda.
You have no standing to issue a demand like that, lying
Larry. You can barely *spell* science; you sure as
hell dont know any, and your pages are NOT
scientifically sound.
>
>
>> Including the fact that some types of meat are better for the
>>environment and involve less deaths than some types of
>>veggies.
>
> Science, please. Oh, wait, you have not been able to support this lie
> when challenged for YEARS.
>
>
>>And also that some of them provide decent lives for
>>farm animals, ...
>
> Decent lives: castration, growth hormones, branding, dehorning,
> antibiotics, synthetic food, living caged in filth, debeaking, unnatural
> grotesque genetic mutants, early death, ...
>
>
>> And on grass raised animal products, show that they involve
>>the use of less energy than things like tofu, rice milk, breads
>>and cereals...
>
> Did you forget the biomass and animal life permanently lost by clearing
> natural ecosystems for grazing animals? Did you include the energy and raw
> material inherent in the production of growth hormones, antibiotics, farm
> chemicals, drugs, etc.? And how about the fact that clearing the tropical
> forests to produce hamburgers is contributing to the destabilization of
> weather on the planet? Did you forget that animals convert ~5-10% of the
> protein they eat to animal protein, thus wasting 90% of the protein
> production of the land?
>
> Laurie
>
>