On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:51:07 +0000, Greg Hennessy wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:42:08 +0000, Whistler wrote:
>
>
>>>>They dont, which is why you have no basis on which
>>>>to assert I should foreswear medical treatments
>>>>perfected with the use of animals,
>>>
>>>Oh but I do
>>
>>No, you dont. Its your rule, and one to which I dont
>>subscribe because I dont accept the responsibility
>>for those deaths.
>
>Thats because you cannot help being a hypocrite. .
No. Its because I dont personally kill them or direct others
to kill them on my behalf. You, however, have implied that if
one benefits from anothers rights violations, then that person
is responsible for those rights violations, yet you dont apply
this irrational rule to yourself regarding the human rights
violations surrounding your own lifestyle and purchases of
products provided by children held in slave conditions. You
wont even take the time to find out which drugs to avoid,
either, and this is after Ive shown you that medical progress
in fact benefited from violating human rights. In short, youre
a hypocrite whose willing to make up irrational rules for others
which youre not willing to follow yourself.
>>You, however, have implied that if
>>one benefits
>
>Just the evangelical vegans and animal rights nutters.
>
>>from anothers rights violations, then that
>>person is responsible for those rights violations,
>
>Of course they are.
Then why havent you made a list of the things to avoid which
involved human rights violations, such as in the material I keep
supplying concerning children held in slavery to produce your
coffee and chocolate, and the meds which were perfected
using humans against their will?
>[diversionary irrelevance binned unread]
Your arrogance and denial is appalling. You know that human
children are being used to produce your goods, and youve been
shown evidence where humans have been used against their will
or knowledge to perfect your meds, yet you dont follow your
own rule and avoid them, so why is that, hypocrite?