ANIMAL FORUM

A place where people talk about animals
It is currently January 8, 2009, 3:35 am

All times are UTC





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 2003-08-20 22:21:59
Online
Registered User

Joined: 2003-08-20 22:21:59
Jonathan Ball wrote in message
news:TxP0b.1133$lw4.798@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> pearl wrote:
>
> > Jonathan Ball wrote in message
> > news:FkP0b.1118$lw4.790@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >
> >>You claim that Darwin addressed what is right for us to eat,
> >
> > You should have read this by now.
> >
> > At the period and place, whenever and wherever it
> > was, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably
> > inhabited a hot country; a circumstance favourable for
> > the frugi-ferous diet on which, judging from analogy, he
> > subsisted. Charles Darwin
>
> I have. Its speculative, tentative, not really
> science at all.

Keywords: judging from analogy - to other primates.

> It also doesnt show that Darwins
> theory of evolution addresses, IN ANY WAY, the right
> diet for man: the snippet is not part of his theory of
> natural selection.

It would be beyond my limits, and quite beyond my knowledge,
even to name the innumerable points of structure in which man
agrees with the other primates. Our great anatomist and philosopher,
Prof. Huxley, has fully discussed this subject,* and concludes that
man in all parts of his organization differs less from the higher apes,
than these do from the lower members of the same group.
Consequently there is no justification for placing man in a
distinct order.
http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/charles darwin/descent of
man/chapter 06.html.

WHITHER PRIMATOLOGY? The Place of Primates in
Contemporary Anthropology
P.S. Rodman
Department of Anthropology, University of California
..
Larger-bodied primates are more likely to feed on significant
quantities of fibrous foods such as pith and leaves. ..
Folivores and insectivores have high, sharp molar cusps that
divide structural carbohydrate (lignin, chitin) during chewing,
whereas frugivores have lower, rounder molar cusps (Kay 1975).
..
When fruit is scarce or absent,western lowland gorillas take
greater quantities of fibrous vegetation. In contrast, closely
related, sympatric chimpanzees change behavior from social
to solitary foraging while maintaining their more frugivorous
diet (Tutin & Fernandez1993).

Visual Perception
Refined visual perception has long been accepted as one
of the suite of characteristics of living primates, and color
perception is an additional derived refinement of the
primates visual system (Bowmaker 1998, Jacobs 1994).
The primary hypothesis explaining the function of color
perception is that colors indicate nutritional quality of food
and particularly facilitate finding ripe fruit. Recent empirical
measurements and experimental studies indicate that colors
of leaves are associated with nutritional quality of the leaves
(Lucas et al1998) and that the color perception of primates
facilitates finding fruits in a leafy background (Regan et al
1998) and that the color perception of primates facilitates
finding fruits in a leafy background (Regan et al 1998). ..
One comparative study concludes that there is a specific
relationship between development of some visual areas of
the neocortex and feeding patterns in primates, and that the
development of the parvocellular pathway corresponds to
generally larger brains in frugivorous species (Barton 1998).

The importance of spatial memory for locating food has
long been suspected to be a selective factor in the evolution
of increased intelligence (Milton 1988), and there is some
evidence from comparative analysis that there is a positive
correlation between size of the neocortex and foraging
patterns (Barton 1996).

Range size is larger for primate species that have larger bodies;
range size increases with group size, both within and between
species; ranges of terrestrial primates are larger than those of
arboreal primates; and folivores have smaller ranges than do
frugivores for a particular body size and group size. These
relationships arise from the natural increase in food
requirements as body size or group size, or both, increase,
from the lower density of food per unit of area on the ground
in comparison with a forest canopy, and from the generally
higher density of foliage and other fibrous food than of fruit in
all habitats.
..
Feeding competition may be low for gorillas. They take
significant quantities of fruit when it is available to them
(Kuroda et al 1996, Nishihara 1995, Remis 1997,Tutin
& Fernandez 1993), but unlike frugivorous chimpanzees,
gorillas can subsist exclusively on fibrous diets.
....
http://anthro.annualreviews.org/cgi/reprint/28/1/311.

At the period and place, whenever and wherever it
was, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably
inhabited a hot country; a circumstance favourable for
the frugi-ferous diet on which, judging from analogy, he
subsisted. Charles Darwin


--
The human appears organized to feed on fruits, roots and
the succulent parts of vegetables. His short mandibles of
medium force, his canines of the same length as his other
teeth, and his tuberous molars do not permit him to chew
grass or devour meat without preparing these foods through
cooking. His organs are formed in accordance with the
disposition of his teeth. His stomach is simple and his intestinal
tract is of medium length and very well fixed to his large intestine.
-Georges Cuvier (1769-1832), Regne Animal, Vol 1, p73


Top
 Profile
 
PostPosted: 2003-08-20 23:23:08
Online
Registered User

Joined: 2003-08-20 23:23:08
pearl wrote in message
news:bi0qij$8td$1@kermit.esat.net...
> Jonathan Ball wrote in message
news:TxP0b.1133$lw4.798@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > pearl wrote:
> > > Jonathan Ball wrote in message
news:FkP0b.1118$lw4.790@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > >
> > >>You claim that Darwin addressed what is right for us to eat,
> > >
> > > You should have read this by now.
> > >
> > > At the period and place, whenever and wherever it
> > > was, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably
> > > inhabited a hot country; a circumstance favourable for
> > > the frugi-ferous diet on which, judging from analogy, he
> > > subsisted. Charles Darwin
> >
> > I have. Its speculative, tentative, not really
> > science at all.
>
> Keywords: judging from analogy - to other primates.
>
> > It also doesnt show that Darwins
> > theory of evolution addresses, IN ANY WAY, the right
> > diet for man: the snippet is not part of his theory of
> > natural selection.
>
> It would be beyond my limits, and quite beyond my knowledge,
> even to name the innumerable points of structure in which man
> agrees with the other primates. Our great anatomist and philosopher,
> Prof. Huxley, has fully discussed this subject,* and concludes that
> man in all parts of his organization differs less from the higher apes,
> than these do from the lower members of the same group.
> Consequently there is no justification for placing man in a
> distinct order.
> http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/charles darwin/descent of
man/chapter 06.html.
>
> WHITHER PRIMATOLOGY? The Place of Primates in
> Contemporary Anthropology
> P.S. Rodman
> Department of Anthropology, University of California
> ..
> Larger-bodied primates are more likely to feed on significant
> quantities of fibrous foods such as pith and leaves. ..
> Folivores and insectivores have high, sharp molar cusps that
> divide structural carbohydrate (lignin, chitin) during chewing,
> whereas frugivores have lower, rounder molar cusps (Kay 1975).
> ..
> When fruit is scarce or absent,western lowland gorillas take
> greater quantities of fibrous vegetation. In contrast, closely
> related, sympatric chimpanzees change behavior from social
> to solitary foraging while maintaining their more frugivorous
> diet (Tutin & Fernandez1993).
>
> Visual Perception
> Refined visual perception has long been accepted as one
> of the suite of characteristics of living primates, and color
> perception is an additional derived refinement of the
> primates visual system (Bowmaker 1998, Jacobs 1994).
> The primary hypothesis explaining the function of color
> perception is that colors indicate nutritional quality of food
> and particularly facilitate finding ripe fruit. Recent empirical
> measurements and experimental studies indicate that colors
> of leaves are associated with nutritional quality of the leaves
> (Lucas et al1998) and that the color perception of primates
> facilitates finding fruits in a leafy background (Regan et al
> 1998) and that the color perception of primates facilitates
> finding fruits in a leafy background (Regan et al 1998). ..
> One comparative study concludes that there is a specific
> relationship between development of some visual areas of
> the neocortex and feeding patterns in primates, and that the
> development of the parvocellular pathway corresponds to
> generally larger brains in frugivorous species (Barton 1998).
>
> The importance of spatial memory for locating food has
> long been suspected to be a selective factor in the evolution
> of increased intelligence (Milton 1988), and there is some
> evidence from comparative analysis that there is a positive
> correlation between size of the neocortex and foraging
> patterns (Barton 1996).
>
> Range size is larger for primate species that have larger bodies;
> range size increases with group size, both within and between
> species; ranges of terrestrial primates are larger than those of
> arboreal primates; and folivores have smaller ranges than do
> frugivores for a particular body size and group size. These
> relationships arise from the natural increase in food
> requirements as body size or group size, or both, increase,
> from the lower density of food per unit of area on the ground
> in comparison with a forest canopy, and from the generally
> higher density of foliage and other fibrous food than of fruit in
> all habitats.
> ..
> Feeding competition may be low for gorillas. They take
> significant quantities of fruit when it is available to them
> (Kuroda et al 1996, Nishihara 1995, Remis 1997,Tutin
> & Fernandez 1993), but unlike frugivorous chimpanzees,
> gorillas can subsist exclusively on fibrous diets.
> ....
> http://anthro.annualreviews.org/cgi/reprint/28/1/311.
>
> At the period and place, whenever and wherever it
> was, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably
> inhabited a hot country; a circumstance favourable for
> the frugi-ferous diet on which, judging from analogy, he
> subsisted. Charles Darwin
>
From this statement below;
[In North America the black bear was seen by Hearne swimming
for hours with widely open mouth, thus catching, like a whale,
insects in the water. Even in so extreme a case as this, if the
supply of insects were constant, and if better adapted competitors
did not already exist in the country, I can see no difficulty in a
race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more and more
aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths,
till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale.]
http://www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/darwin/Darwin VI.htm

Darwin more than suggests that a species will adapt anatomically
according to its diet. That being so, the absence of any anatomic
adaptations to man enabling him to better cope with meat more
than suggests we arent, or are even meant to eat it. Either that
or mans current diet on meat is a relatively new dirty habit.

> --
> The human appears organized to feed on fruits, roots and
> the succulent parts of vegetables. His short mandibles of
> medium force, his canines of the same length as his other
> teeth, and his tuberous molars do not permit him to chew
> grass or devour meat without preparing these foods through
> cooking. His organs are formed in accordance with the
> disposition of his teeth. His stomach is simple and his intestinal
> tract is of medium length and very well fixed to his large intestine.
> -Georges Cuvier (1769-1832), Regne Animal, Vol 1, p73
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Top
 Profile
 
PostPosted: 2003-08-21 00:13:39
Online
Registered User

Joined: 2003-08-21 00:13:39
Derek wrote in message
news:bi0sc6$428uc$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> pearl wrote in message
news:bi0qij$8td$1@kermit.esat.net...
> > Jonathan Ball wrote in message
news:TxP0b.1133$lw4.798@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > > pearl wrote:
> > > > Jonathan Ball wrote in message
news:FkP0b.1118$lw4.790@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > > >
> > > >>You claim that Darwin addressed what is right for us to eat,
> > > >
> > > > You should have read this by now.
> > > >
> > > > At the period and place, whenever and wherever it
> > > > was, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably
> > > > inhabited a hot country; a circumstance favourable for
> > > > the frugi-ferous diet on which, judging from analogy, he
> > > > subsisted. Charles Darwin
> > >
> > > I have. Its speculative, tentative, not really
> > > science at all.
> >
> > Keywords: judging from analogy - to other primates.
> >
> > > It also doesnt show that Darwins
> > > theory of evolution addresses, IN ANY WAY, the right
> > > diet for man: the snippet is not part of his theory of
> > > natural selection.
> >
> > It would be beyond my limits, and quite beyond my knowledge,
> > even to name the innumerable points of structure in which man
> > agrees with the other primates. Our great anatomist and philosopher,
> > Prof. Huxley, has fully discussed this subject,* and concludes that
> > man in all parts of his organization differs less from the higher apes,
> > than these do from the lower members of the same group.
> > Consequently there is no justification for placing man in a
> > distinct order.
> > http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/charles darwin/descent of
man/chapter 06.html.
> >
> > WHITHER PRIMATOLOGY? The Place of Primates in
> > Contemporary Anthropology
> > P.S. Rodman
> > Department of Anthropology, University of California
> > ..
> > Larger-bodied primates are more likely to feed on significant
> > quantities of fibrous foods such as pith and leaves. ..
> > Folivores and insectivores have high, sharp molar cusps that
> > divide structural carbohydrate (lignin, chitin) during chewing,
> > whereas frugivores have lower, rounder molar cusps (Kay 1975).
> > ..
> > When fruit is scarce or absent,western lowland gorillas take
> > greater quantities of fibrous vegetation. In contrast, closely
> > related, sympatric chimpanzees change behavior from social
> > to solitary foraging while maintaining their more frugivorous
> > diet (Tutin & Fernandez1993).
> >
> > Visual Perception
> > Refined visual perception has long been accepted as one
> > of the suite of characteristics of living primates, and color
> > perception is an additional derived refinement of the
> > primates visual system (Bowmaker 1998, Jacobs 1994).
> > The primary hypothesis explaining the function of color
> > perception is that colors indicate nutritional quality of food
> > and particularly facilitate finding ripe fruit. Recent empirical
> > measurements and experimental studies indicate that colors
> > of leaves are associated with nutritional quality of the leaves
> > (Lucas et al1998) and that the color perception of primates
> > facilitates finding fruits in a leafy background (Regan et al
> > 1998) ..
> > One comparative study concludes that there is a specific
> > relationship between development of some visual areas of
> > the neocortex and feeding patterns in primates, and that the
> > development of the parvocellular pathway corresponds to
> > generally larger brains in frugivorous species (Barton 1998).
> >
> > The importance of spatial memory for locating food has
> > long been suspected to be a selective factor in the evolution
> > of increased intelligence (Milton 1988), and there is some
> > evidence from comparative analysis that there is a positive
> > correlation between size of the neocortex and foraging
> > patterns (Barton 1996).
> >
> > Range size is larger for primate species that have larger bodies;
> > range size increases with group size, both within and between
> > species; ranges of terrestrial primates are larger than those of
> > arboreal primates; and folivores have smaller ranges than do
> > frugivores for a particular body size and group size. These
> > relationships arise from the natural increase in food
> > requirements as body size or group size, or both, increase,
> > from the lower density of food per unit of area on the ground
> > in comparison with a forest canopy, and from the generally
> > higher density of foliage and other fibrous food than of fruit in
> > all habitats.
> > ..
> > Feeding competition may be low for gorillas. They take
> > significant quantities of fruit when it is available to them
> > (Kuroda et al 1996, Nishihara 1995, Remis 1997,Tutin
> > & Fernandez 1993), but unlike frugivorous chimpanzees,
> > gorillas can subsist exclusively on fibrous diets.
> > ....
> > http://anthro.annualreviews.org/cgi/reprint/28/1/311.
> >
> > At the period and place, whenever and wherever it
> > was, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably
> > inhabited a hot country; a circumstance favourable for
> > the frugi-ferous diet on which, judging from analogy, he
> > subsisted. Charles Darwin
> >
> From this statement below;
> [In North America the black bear was seen by Hearne swimming
> for hours with widely open mouth, thus catching, like a whale,
> insects in the water. Even in so extreme a case as this, if the
> supply of insects were constant, and if better adapted competitors
> did not already exist in the country, I can see no difficulty in a
> race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more and more
> aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths,
> till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale.]
> http://www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/darwin/Darwin VI.htm
>
> Darwin more than suggests that a species will adapt anatomically
> according to its diet. That being so, the absence of any anatomic
> adaptations to man enabling him to better cope with meat more
> than suggests we arent, or are even meant to eat it. Either that
> or mans current diet on meat is a relatively new dirty habit.

All three statements are true. This just in;

Nearly All Heart Risk Due To Bad Habits
8-20-03

CHICAGO (Reuters) -- The vast majority of heart attacks strike
people who either smoke, have high blood pressure, high cholesterol
or diabetes, debunking the perception that heart problems can strike
anyone, researchers said on Tuesday. Roughly nine out of 10 patients
surveyed suffered from one of the four risk factors, often for years,
before experiencing a heart problem, according to a pair of reports
that analyzed accumulated data from previous studies.
..
Based on these and related findings concerning the major risk factors,
we suggest that preventing development of unfavorable levels of blood
cholesterol and blood pressure, cigarette smoking, diabetes, and
unfavorable body weight (as a precursor of unfavorable blood lipid
and blood pressure levels and diabetes) should be given even greater
priority than is presently the case, he wrote.
..
It is increasingly clear that the four conventional risk factors and their
resulting health risks are largely preventable by a healthy lifestyle, wrote
study author Umesh Khot of Indiana Heart Physicians in Indianapolis.
.....
http://news.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=M3UJBFQ
OE42T0CRBAE0CFEY?type=healthNews&storyID303533

Metabolism 1997 May;46(5):530-7
Effect of a diet high in vegetables, fruit, and nuts on serum lipids.
Jenkins DJ, Popovich DG, Kendall CW, Vidgen E, Tariq N,
Ransom TP, Wolever TM, Vuksan V, Mehling CC, Boctor DL,
Bolognesi C, Huang J, Patten R.
Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Center, Division
of Endocrinology, St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

We assessed the effect of a diet high in leafy and green vegetables,
fruit, and nuts on serum lipid risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
Ten healthy volunteers (seven men and three women aged 33 +/- 4
years [mean +/- SEM]; body mass index, 23 +/- 1 kg/m2) consumed
their habitual diet (control diet, 29% +/- 2% fat calories) and a diet
consisting largely of leafy and other low-calorie vegetables, fruit, and
nuts (vegetable diet, 25% +/- 3% fat calories) for two 2-week periods
in a randomized crossover design. After 2 weeks on the vegetable diet,
lipid risk factors for cardiovascular disease were significantly reduced
by comparison with the control diet (low-density lipoprotein [LDL]
cholesterol, 33% +/- 4%, P < .001; ratio of total to high-density
lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, 21% +/- 4%, P X .001; apolipoprotein
[apo] B:A-I, 23% +/- 2%, P < .001; and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)],
24% +/- 9%, P = .031). The reduction in apo B was related to
increased intakes of soluble fiber (r = .84, P = .003) and vegetable
protein (r = -.65, P = .041). On the vegetable compared with the
control diet, the reduction in total serum cholesterol was 34% to 49%
greater than would be predicted by differences in dietary fat and
cholesterol. A diet consisting largely of low-calorie vegetables and
fruit and nuts markedly reduced lipid risk factors for cardiovascular
disease. Several aspects of such diets, which may have been consumed
early in human evolution, have implications for cardiovascular disease
prevention.
Publication Types: Clinical trial Randomized controlled trial
PMID: 9160820 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

> > --
> > The human appears organized to feed on fruits, roots and
> > the succulent parts of vegetables. His short mandibles of
> > medium force, his canines of the same length as his other
> > teeth, and his tuberous molars do not permit him to chew
> > grass or devour meat without preparing these foods through
> > cooking. His organs are formed in accordance with the
> > disposition of his teeth. His stomach is simple and his intestinal
> > tract is of medium length and very well fixed to his large intestine.
> > -Georges Cuvier (1769-1832), Regne Animal, Vol 1, p73


Top
 Profile
 
PostPosted: 2003-08-21 03:08:55
Online
Registered User

Joined: 2003-08-21 03:08:55
pearl wrote:

> Jonathan Ball wrote in message
> news:TxP0b.1133$lw4.798@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>>pearl wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Jonathan Ball wrote in message
>>>news:FkP0b.1118$lw4.790@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>You claim that Darwin addressed what is right for us to eat,
>>>
>>>You should have read this by now.
>>>
>>> At the period and place, whenever and wherever it
>>> was, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably
>>> inhabited a hot country; a circumstance favourable for
>>> the frugi-ferous diet on which, judging from analogy, he
>>> subsisted. Charles Darwin
>>
>>I have. Its speculative, tentative, not really
>>science at all.
>
>
> Keywords: judging from analogy - to other primates.

Judging from analogy is a euphemism for GUESSING, you
stupid skank.

Anyway: you are arguing, WRONGLY, that he is inferring
that we are frugivores based on what we EAT. But
YOU, you dishonest syphilitic skank, say that it is
INCORRECT to conclude that we are omnivores because we
eat an omnivorous diet.

You cant have it both ways, you lying skank.

>
>
>>It also doesnt show that Darwins
>>theory of evolution addresses, IN ANY WAY, the right
>>diet for man: the snippet is not part of his theory of
>>natural selection.
>
>
> It would be beyond my limits, and quite beyond my knowledge,
> even to name the innumerable points of structure in which man
> agrees with the other primates.

So?

> Our great anatomist and philosopher,
> Prof. Huxley,

You FUCKING lying whore! That earlier piece of
BULLSHIT you posted from Hugh Falconer was saying
exactly how WRONG Huxley was.

Does Huxley (hence Darwin) know what hes talking
about, you fucking whore, or is Falconer right and
Huxley is full of shit?

You cant have it both ways, you filthy syphilitic whore.

> has fully discussed this subject,* and concludes that
> man in all parts of his organization differs less from the higher apes,
> than these do from the lower members of the same group.
> Consequently there is no justification for placing man in a
> distinct order.
> http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/charles darwin/descent of
man/chapter 06.html.
>

[snip nonsense about non-human primates that doesnt
bear on human diet]


This is NOT where you got the stuff above (that doesnt
support your BULLSHIT contention that humans are
frugivores). That article costs US$15.00, and you
didnt pay it.

>
> At the period and place, whenever and wherever it
> was, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably
> inhabited a hot country; a circumstance favourable for
> the frugi-ferous diet on which, judging from analogy, he
> subsisted. Charles Darwin

Assuming he even wrote it, Darwin is not classifying
humans as frugivores with that statement.

You are an idiot.

--
The Last Word: Darwins theory of natural selection
does not lead to a conclusion that man is a frugivore.


Top
 Profile
 
PostPosted: 2003-08-21 03:13:30
Online
Registered User

Joined: 2003-08-21 03:13:30
The Whore wrote:

> Shit4Braincell wrote in message
news:bi0sc6$428uc$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
>>The Whore wrote in message
news:bi0qij$8td$1@kermit.esat.net...
>>
>>>Jonathan Ball wrote in message
>
> news:TxP0b.1133$lw4.798@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>>>>The Whore wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Jonathan Ball wrote in message
>
> news:FkP0b.1118$lw4.790@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
[...]
>>Darwin more than suggests that a species will adapt anatomically
>>according to its diet. That being so, the absence of any anatomic
>>adaptations to man enabling him to better cope with meat more
>>than suggests we arent, or are even meant to eat it. Either that
>>or mans current diet on meat is a relatively new dirty habit.
>
>
> All three statements are true.

Thats great:

Shit4Braincell:
Darwin more than suggests that a species will adapt
anatomically according to its diet.

The Whore:
All three statements [including the bullshit
Shit4braincell wrote] are true.


Well, well, well! Darwin more than suggests that a
species will adapt anatomically according to its diet,
and the whore agrees with it. The whore agrees,
therefore, that humans have an adaptation to eating
meat. QED.

--
The Last Word: Darwins theory of natural selection
does not lead to a conclusion that man is a frugivore.


Top
 Profile
 
PostPosted: 2003-08-21 09:55:11
Online
Registered User

Joined: 2003-08-21 09:55:11
Jonathan Ball wrote in message
news:uNW0b.1711$lw4.1199@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...

> >>Darwin more than suggests that a species will adapt anatomically
> >>according to its diet. That being so, the absence of any anatomic
> >>adaptations to man enabling him to better cope with meat more
> >>than suggests we arent, or are even meant to eat it. Either that
> >>or mans current diet on meat is a relatively new dirty habit.
> >
> > All three statements are true.
>
> Thats great:
>
> Derek:
> Darwin more than suggests that a species will adapt
> anatomically according to its diet.
>
> Pearl:
> All three statements [including what Derek wrote]
> are true.
>
> Well, well, well! Darwin more than suggests that a
> species will adapt anatomically according to its diet,
> and Pearl agrees with it. Pearl agrees, therefore, that
> humans have an adaptation to eating meat. QED.
>
No. She agrees that humans *should* have an adaption
to eat meat iff we were true meatarians of long standing,
but seeing as we dont have any adaptations it is clear
that a meatarian diet is relatively new to us.

As usual, you are lying and snipping away half of your
opponents statement to reach a different conclusion
from it.
--
At the period and place, whenever and wherever it
was, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably
inhabited a hot country; a circumstance favourable for
the frugi-ferous diet on which, judging from analogy, he
subsisted. Charles Darwin


Top
 Profile
 
PostPosted: 2003-08-21 13:15:09
Online
Registered User

Joined: 2003-08-21 13:15:09
Derek wrote:

> (A) humans are like (B) other primates.
> (B) have the property (P), are frugivores.
> Therefore, (A) Humans have the property (P),
> are frugivores.

Wrong. Please support your faulty syllogism with proofs. A frugivore is
an animal that eats fruit. Most primates, particularly higher primates
like humans, are omnivores.

I did overgeneralize stating that *all* primates are frugivore.
lilweed, aka Lotus, aka pearl (16 August 2000)
http://tinyurl.com/kpva

Specifically answer the following questions:
How many primate species are frugivores?
What are their characteristics?
What are characteristics of omnivorous primates?
Where do humans really fit in to those specifically defined, scientific
categories?


Top
 Profile
 
PostPosted: 2003-08-21 14:31:26
Online
Registered User

Joined: 2003-08-21 14:31:26
usual suspect wrote in message
news:xB31b.521$Xp4.41782@twister.austin.rr.com...
> Derek wrote:
>
> > (A) humans are like (B) other primates.
> > (B) have the property (P), are frugivores.
> > Therefore, (A) Humans have the property (P),
> > are frugivores.
>
> Wrong.

I am correct. Jonathan insists that an analogy
is a euphemism for GUESSING. I jumped in
and corrected him by writing;
No, it is not, stupid. An analogy is in the form
(A) is like (B).
B has property P.
Therefore, A has property P.
(Where the analogy between A and B is strong.)

You dishonestly snipped all that away though.


Top
 Profile
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 



 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
No new posts Recommended viewing: BBC3 - Kill It, Cook It, Eat It returns this time the killing of infant animals as young as three weeks!

0

2008-01-08 00:22:54

No new posts Meet your meat: MRSA from your pork chops. You are what you eat. was Re: Private vets putting their hands up.

0

2007-11-20 18:35:16

No new posts Whats in your toothpaste? Fluoride To Make Prisoners stupid & Docile

0

2007-11-13 11:14:18

No new posts Yet another bird flu outbreak. 1000s of filthy birds slaughtered yet again. How can we eat this crap?

0

2007-11-13 08:55:17

No new posts Re: Kill It, Leave It, Deny It (was: Re: Kill It, Cook It, Eat It)

0

2007-03-22 13:35:16

No new posts Kill It, Cook It, Eat It

0

2007-03-05 16:20:08

No new posts WHATS WRONG WITH DEER HUNTING?

0

2005-10-11 08:36:10

No new posts Whats Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed ===================== gle

0

2004-09-23 04:16:02

No new posts Whats Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed nRd

0

2004-09-01 12:16:08

No new posts Re: Darwin knew whats right for us to eat

0

2003-08-20 19:37:58


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Derek,UkJay, 6 guests, wózki widłowe Stonka Store zbiorniki siłownia sprzęt Better songs for yours soul


New posts New posts    No new posts No new posts    Announce Announcement
New posts [ Popular ] New posts [ Popular ]    No new posts [ Popular ] No new posts [ Popular ]    Sticky Sticky
New posts [ Locked ] New posts [ Locked ]    No new posts [ Locked ] No new posts [ Locked ]    Moved topic Moved topic
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 luxury poznan phpBB Group