ANIMAL FORUM

>
>dh@. wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:09:06 +0100, pearl wrote:
>>
>> >Dave wrote in message
news:1143732352.665533.147310@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> >>
>> >> pearl wrote:
>> >> > wrote in message
news:gh1j22hpq561dgofr0rr0ik4oj82rv6gmt@4ax.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > > Shes in hell and youre her devil.
>> >> >
>> >> > Youre crazy.
>> >>
>> >> It was an extraordinary outburst wasnt it? Especially from someone
>> >> who used to breed cocks for fighting.
>> >
>> >Yes. Indeed. I guess it punctures his ARAs dont provide yada yada..
>>
>> In a way it was a joke, since I imagine the thing is living a decent
life
>> even if it would be happier with another goat around. Maybe it wouldnt.
>> It would almost certainly depend on the particular goat, and other things
>> as well. But! Since you aras are opposed to people deliberately
>> providing decent lives for animals we use for food--which is AW or the
>> Logic of the Larder, NOT ar!!!--I feel everyone is entitled to criticise
>> you for doing that which you are opposed to seeing other people do.
>
>Who said ARAs were opposed to providing decent lives for animals we use
>for food?

>Were just opposed to inflicting suffering on them or killing
>them.

> On 31 Mar 2006 15:17:28 -0800, rupertmccallum@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >
> >dh@. wrote:
> >> On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:09:06 +0100, pearl wrote:
> >>
> >> >Dave wrote in message
news:1143732352.665533.147310@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> >>
> >> >> pearl wrote:
> >> >> > wrote in message
news:gh1j22hpq561dgofr0rr0ik4oj82rv6gmt@4ax.com...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > Shes in hell and youre her devil.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Youre crazy.
> >> >>
> >> >> It was an extraordinary outburst wasnt it? Especially from someone
> >> >> who used to breed cocks for fighting.
> >> >
> >> >Yes. Indeed. I guess it punctures his ARAs dont provide yada yada..
> >>
> >> In a way it was a joke, since I imagine the thing is living a decent
life
> >> even if it would be happier with another goat around. Maybe it wouldnt.
> >> It would almost certainly depend on the particular goat, and other things
> >> as well. But! Since you aras are opposed to people deliberately
> >> providing decent lives for animals we use for food--which is AW or the
> >> Logic of the Larder, NOT ar!!!--I feel everyone is entitled to criticise
> >> you for doing that which you are opposed to seeing other people do.
> >
> >Who said ARAs were opposed to providing decent lives for animals we use
> >for food?
>
> Those who say they believe all animals have the right to be free.
>

> >Were just opposed to inflicting suffering on them or killing
> >them.
>
> Ive been wondering exactly what you aras believe is
> wrong with raising animals to eat. We know its not that it
> deprives them of life, since they only have life *because*
> they are raised to eat, so what exactly is the wrongness?